Extreme Makeover: Wichita Edition came to town this past week. It was fascinating for our community to see a house go up in 5 days. From the laying of the foundation to the planting of the last mum, the crowds that gathered to watch and volunteer got what they came for: A touching, emotional resolution to a deserving family's plight. (The featured family's Rose Hill, KS home was destroyed in a propane blast earlier this year.)
It is amazing what can be done with a plan and a purpose! And what around-the-clock activity can accomplish. Nearly 2,000 people chanted "Move That Bus" as the house was 'revealed' today (the show will air in about a month). Such excitement, applause, patting of backs. So why stop there? Why not go next door and help that neighbor, and then the next one, and the next? After all, aren't there other deserving families in need of assistance?
The answer is, of course there are. Would that everyone were as fortunate as those picked by Ty Pennington and the ABC home crew (I know, I know, Ty doesn't pick 'em). But I guess that's my point. What's truly behind the choosing of this (or any) show's participants? Without taking anything away from this particular family, shouldn't we step back and at least explore some of the underlying themes of what we just saw happen this past week?
Themes like: The Lottery Mentality - "You have to be lucky to get ahead."
Or, Vicarious Living - Where television characters become part of our reality.
Or, in it's worst form, Voyeurism - When we get our thrills watching others debase themselves, a la Jerry Springer.
I'm not saying that any of these motivations should be attached to the Kansas edition of this exciting event. But, in general, isn't there an inherent concern that, in our media-saturated culture, we might simply be actors in our own Truman Show? I fear that we might believe ourselves to be stars, but in reality we let others produce our lives and determine our roles.