Monday, January 16, 2012
Grammar Nazi BeGone!
Yep, I was one. I use to believe that grammar rules were absolute. But times have changed and so have I. Or rather, the rules have changed and I finally got a clue. Let's say it together: Grammar - that indefinable set of examples of syntax and word usage - changes over time.
That's right, indefinable. Oh, we claim there is this thing called Standard English Usage. But who decides just exactly what is standard at this point in time? What passes as standard here in America is different than the standard in Great Britain.
Now, granted, we all utilize a kind of Textus Receptus of English vocabulary, sentence structure, spelling norms, etc. All well and good. As a result of this usage we've developed a set of "rules" that explain what we've come up with. They tell us how we've been using English after the fact. Did you catch that? These "rules" are descriptive in nature. Not prescriptive.
Bottom line? What passes as proper grammar is simply not written in stone. But many people insist that it is. Meet the grammar police. They'll correct you if you write or say something that doesn't jibe with their sense of propriety. They have rules and they're sticking with 'em.
Well, I have rules too. In future posts - consider this an occasional series - I'll tackle a few examples of what I think are just dumb grammar practices that some insist should be standard practices for everyone everywhere. Feel free to participate. But if you're into hard and fast rules, beware. I may turn my new anti-snooty cream on you: Grammar Nazi BeGone!
PS This is all in good fun, btw. Future discussion will likely include split infinitives, place of prepositions, double negatives, text-speak, etc. What are some of your most passionate beliefs regarding grammar?
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
One of my passions: "Was" is not the devil. Sometimes it is necessary. For example: "He was reading a book when I walked into the room." You do NOT change it to, "He read a book when I walked into the room." O_oReplyDelete
Nor is every instance of "was" a case of passive voice. For example: "He was reading the book," is not passive. "The book was being read by him," is.
Drives. Me. Nuts.
Welcome to the dark side, my friend!! So many people forget literature is an art. You could say the Mona Lisa is not the best work of art but would you say it is wrong? Now, I'm not against be able to write for the appropriate venue. I blog in my speaking voice. I don't talk with perfect English so I don't write in perfect English. If I need to write a paper on Hard Times by Dickens for a lit class, I will use my proper English. It really comes down to knowing your audience like a great comedienne.ReplyDelete
Good call, Kat. I believe in consistency that facilitates understanding. Some "rules" just confuse and are not based on real usage.ReplyDelete
And, June, I agree - we have different "registers" depending on our audience. I teach "standard" English to my 6th graders because it's the best register in our current culture to open doors of opportunity.
I lot of my character speak like me, in Derbyshire English. I like it.ReplyDelete
Deb, I think almost any rule can be broken in the interest of "voice" lol.ReplyDelete